In this episode of Good Morning Liberty, Nate Thurston dives into the follow-up segment of 'Dumb Bleep of the Week,' offering a critique on various current events and personalities. With Charlie Thompson away at a conference, Nate tackles eight distinct segments, including discussions on the backlash against billionaires, remarks on Elon Musk, immigration issues, and criticisms of Gavin Newsom, among others. He also explores the complex role of figures like Rabbi Schmuley and Tucker Carlson in today's political discourse. The show wraps up with an extended critique of alarming shifts in political messaging and actions. Join Nate for a deep dive into the week's most absurd and controversial topics. 00:00 Intro 00:23 Billionaires 05:22 Elon Musk and His Promises 09:31 Government Spending and Economic Policies 19:46 Gavin Newsom's Unmet Goals 23:09 Political Donors and Influence 26:39 Isolationism vs. Global Engagement 32:43 Deplatforming and Free Speech 47:05 Ben Shapiro's Response to Tucker Carlson 47:30 Venezuela's Economic Crisis and Usury 50:58 The Impact of Abortion Policies in Venezuela 56:14 The Debate on Payday Loans and Usury 01:06:14 Tucker Carlson's Economic Views 01:10:14 Jasmine Crockett and Democratic Messaging 01:15:25 Epstein, Trump, and Democratic Controversies 01:20:00 Dumb Bleep of the Week Voting 🚨Prolon is offering listeners 15% off sitewide plus a $40 bonus gift when you subscribe to their 5-Day Program! Just visit https://ProlonLife.com/GML 🔗[ALL LINKS]: https://gml.bio.link 📼 [YouTube] :https://bit.ly/3UwsRiv 🗽[Fed Haters Club]: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub ⏳[Martens Minute]: https://martensminute.podbean.com/ This is a reaction/commentary video created through video editing software, professional video and sound equipment, and original footage. My goal is to provide significant value to the original content by adding transformative analysis, critiques, and context to the original clip. ► Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, does not constitute an infringement of copyright." This video makes use of the original copyrighted material for purposes of commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research, all of which fall under fair use as defined by the law.